Contributors: Timothy H. Frawley, Barbara A. Muhling, Stephanie Brodie, Hannah Blondin, Heather Welch, Martin C. Arostegui, Steven J. Bograd, Camrin D. Braun, Megan A. Cimino, Nima Farchadi, Elliott L. Hazen, Desiree Tommasi, Michael G. Jacox

Organizations: Institute of Marine Science, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA • Environmental Research Division, NOAA Southwest Fisheries Science Center, Monterey, CA • Fisheries Resources Division, NOAA Southwest Fisheries Science Center, La Jolla, CA • Hopkins Marine Station, Stanford University, Pacific Grove, California • Biology Department, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts • San Diego State University, San Diego, California • Graduate Group in Ecology, University of California, Davis, California • Physical Sciences Laboratory, NOAA Earth System Research Laboratories, Boulder, CO

Summary: The management and conservation of tuna and other transboundary marine species have to date been limited by an incomplete understanding of the oceanographic, ecological and socioeconomic factors mediating fishery overlap and interactions, and how these factors vary across expansive, open ocean habitats. Despite advances in fisheries monitoring and biologging technology, few attempts have been made to conduct integrated ecological analyses at basin scales relevant to pelagic fisheries and the highly migratory species they target. Here, we use vessel tracking data, archival tags, observer records, and machine learning to examine inter- and intra-annual variability in fisheries overlap (2013–2020) of five pelagic longline fishing fleets with North Pacific albacore tuna (Thunnus alalunga, Scombridae). Although progressive declines in catch and biomass have been observed over the past several decades, the North Pacific albacore is one of the only Pacific tuna stocks primarily targeted by pelagic longlines not currently listed as overfished or experiencing overfishing. We find that fishery overlap varies significantly across time and space as mediated by (1) differences in habitat preferences between juvenile and adult albacore; (2) variation of oceanographic features known to aggregate pelagic biomass; and (3) the different spatial niches targeted by shallow-set and deep-set longline fishing gear. These findings may have significant implications for stock assessment in this and other transboundary fishery systems, particularly the reliance on fishery-dependent data to index abundance. Indeed, we argue that additional consideration of how overlap, catchability, and size selectivity parameters vary over time and space may be required to ensure the development of robust, equitable, and climate-resilient harvest control rules.

Previous
Previous

Impact of the 2014–2016 marine heatwave on US and Canada West Coast fisheries: Surprises and lessons from key case studies

Next
Next

Changes to the structure and function of an albacore fishery reveal shifting social-ecological realities for Pacific Northwest fishermen